Further to what was discussed in the earlier post, ( Ijtehad in sharia allowed? ), in which we it was shown that the term ijtehad has not been used in ahadith and our classical scholars such as Shaikh Tusi have condemned ijtehad; we will now take a look at the technical definition of ijtehad as provided by some of our greatest scholars.
Muhammad Ibrahim Jannati says in his book, "Ijtihad: Its Meaning, Sources, Beginnings and the Practice of Ra'y":
"(f) The great mujtahid al‑`Allamah al‑Hilli (648‑726/1250‑1325), in his work al Nihayah on usul al‑fiqh, writes: Ijtihad means employment of effort for arriving at presumption with regard to a hukm of the Shari ah, in a way that is not blameworthy on account of negligence or omission.
(g) Al‑`Allamah al Turayhi says: Ijtihad is to employ one's effort and endeavour in pursuit of some difficult task and for arriving at presumption with regard to a hukm of the Shari`ah.
(h) The Usuli mujtahid al‑`Amili al‑Jiba`i says: Ijtihad is the effort and endeavour of a faqih in order to arrive at presumption in regard to a hukm of the Shari`ah.
(i) Al‑Shaykh al‑Baha i in his Zubdah quotes al‑Hajibi to the effect that: By ijtihad is meant the exhaustive efforts of a faqih for arriving at presumption in regard to a hukm of the Shari’ah. Al‑`Allamah al‑Hilli agrees with this definition in his book Tahdhib al‑‘usul."
http://www.al-islam.org/al-tawhid/ijtihad/1.htm#6
So is this practice valid? What do ahadith say?
Kafi
محمد بن يحيى، عن أحمد بن محمد، عن الوشاء، عن مثنى الحناط، عن أبي بصير قال: قلت لابي عبدالله (عليه السلام): ترد علينا أشياء ليس نعرفها في كتاب الله ولا سنة فننظر فيها؟ فقال: لا، أما إنك إن أصبت لم تؤجر، وإن أخطأت كذبت على الله عز وجل
Muhammd b.Yahya, from Ahmad b.Muhammad, from al Washa', from Muthnal Hanaat, from Abi Baseer said: (I) said to Abi Abdullah(as) "Things (religious questions) are referred upon us (which) we do not recognize (find) in book of Allah (swt) or sunnah so we look/speculate into it (for answer). (Imam(as)) said "No, if you hit(the mark) you'll get no reward, and if you made mistake then you lied upon Allah (swt)."
Grading
Majlisi (Miratul uqul): حسن Hasan (Good)
Bahboodi: صحيح Sahih (Correct/Authentic)
Kafi
علي بن إبراهيم، عن هارون بن مسلم، عن مسعدة بن صدقة قال: حدثني جعفر، عن أبيه (عليهما السلام) أن عليا صلوات الله عليه قال: من نصب نفسه للقياس لم يزل دهره في التباس، ومن دان الله بالرأي لم يزل دهره في ارتماس، قال: وقال أبوجعفر (عليه السلام): من أفتى الناس برأيه فقد دان الله بما لا يعلم، ومن دان الله بما لا يعلم فقد ضاد الله حيث احل وحرم فيما لا يعلم
Ali b. Ibrahim, from Haroon b. Muslim, from Mas'adah b. Sadaqah who said: Told me Ja'far(as) from his(as) father(as) that Ali(as) said: "Whoever inflicted upon himself of the qiyas (analogy), his lifetime (would be spent) in confusion, and whoever practiced religion of Allah(swt) with ra'y (opinion, presumption etc), his lifetime (would be spent) in a drowned state." (Narrator) said: Abu Ja'far(as) said: "Whoever gives fatwa to people by ra'y then certainly he practiced religion of Allah(swt) with what he did not know, so indeed he opposed Allah where he made halal and haram in what he did not know."
You are mixing between legal ijtihad and illegal ijtehad. Mna you don't want to listen subhanallah.
ReplyDeletewhat would be the your view about issues that were not known during the times of the masoomin(as). give me verse or hadith about artificial fertilization !! give me or verse hadith about use of stem cells etc etc ...
unfortunately brother you are not even understanding the words of sheikh tusi (ts) properly and not understanding the great Allamah al-hilli because you don't even know that allamah al-hilli is considered the head of the Usooli school!!! and you are quoting all sorts of weak and false hadiths.
unfortunately the usooli school also deviated from its true ways and akhbarism infiltrated it and many of the scholars today are just akhbaris acting like usoolis.
now the akhbari school is a great school that was started by allamah al-istrabadi but has its roots back to some early scholars and also allamah al hurr al-amili was akhbari but not like these wannabe-akhbaris of todays as they don't accept all hadiths found in our books and they interpret the ones that are problematic.
if we believe in everything in our books then we end up: mushriks, ignorants , ghalis , mujassim sometimes and mu'attil an other time, believers in tahreef al-quran, etc etc
never mind i am out out of here so good luck. I am tired of all this
@Wasil: Salam!
ReplyDeleteAs for the modern issues, the Imams(as) in their ahadith established some general principles such as everything being halal until proven haram, opposing the aama (although I have feeling you're opposed to this practice, but nevertheless Shaikh Kulaini also recommended this in the muqadimma of kafi) as well as doing ihtiyat/tawaqquf in case of complete confusion. I've mentioned those ahadith on my blog. While the usoolis may argue that they're following these principles themselves to do their ijtehad, but fact of the matter is that they go beyond that and include aql and ijma also as their sources of deriving laws.
And as for believing everything in our books and becoming deviated in terms of aqeeda, then this isn't really an akhbari/usooli issue since their split is on issues of fiqh, not aqaid. Even the usoolis also only do classification of ahadith mainly for fiqhi ahadith, they're very lenient when it comes to ahadith on aqaid. After all, from khomeini to shirazi, almost all our maraji' hold devious beliefs.
Lastly, I believe deviance starts occuring when we follow start believing in ahadith related to merits of the infallibles(as) narrated exclusively in non shi'ite sources. Our ahadith forbid us to believe such ahadith. Unfortunately it's actually the usoolis who believe in those ahadith. For example ayatullah sadiq shirazi wrote 'ahlulbayt fil qur'an', mentioning the virtues of ahlul bayt for deviant sunni sources. This is where deviance starts. If we stick to ou sources we won't get deviated. If a hadith sounds odd then we should just do tawaqquf or if there's another hadith with stronger shawahid then we should give priority to that one.
@the author
ReplyDeleteI advice yo to study books written by Baqar Nisar Zaidi.. especially "kashaf-ul-Haqaiq". you can find it on scribd.com..
About what Wasil said: What is the difference between legal ijtihad and illegal ijtehad then?
ReplyDeleteAs Bhooka posted from the book called "Ijtihad" by Ebrahim Jannati he gave the definition of Ijtihad, surely that wasnt the definition of illegal ijtihad but of the Ijtihad he and other scholars of this time are using.
If really Ijtihad is based on presumption as per what is written in the book then surely Ahadith reject such an approach and even generally it is clearly to be seen like the sun on a hot day, that these ideas of Usul al Fiqh with Ijmah and Aql or Ilm al Rijal in four categories or Ijtihad (even the word itself) or many other similar ideas are just stolen from the Aama and rewritten for our own purposes.
So why should we do such a thing? If we follow what Aimmah (as) have told us and what has reached us today through our authentic sources (for example kutub al arbaa) then we can never go astray as per promise of Rasulallah (s).
I dont understand why we should pursue or even defend these ideas especially Ijtihad.
But if I am mistaken and there is really legal and illegal Ijtihad, then please I want to know the differences and I want to know if Ahadith meant that this so called "illegal ijtihad" is forbidden.
And I want proof from Ahadith that there is no problem with the so called "legal ijtihad".
May Allah forgive us all
My brothеr ѕuggesteԁ I might liκе thiѕ ωеbsitе.
ReplyDeleteНe waѕ totаlly right. Thіs poѕt truly made my ԁay.
You сan not іmagine sіmрly how much tіme І had sρеnt foг this info!
Thanks!
my webрagе: payday loans