Thursday 10 February 2011

Which groups are outside the fold of Islam?

Man la yahdhuruhul faqih

وقال النبي صلى الله عليه وآله: (صنفان من أمتي لا نصيب لهما في الاسلام الناصب لاهل بيتي حربا، وغال في الدين مارق منه).
ومن استحل لعن أميرالمؤمنين عليه السلام والخروج على المسلمين وقتلهم حرمت مناكحته لان فيها الالقاء بالايدي إلى التهلكة، والجهال يتوهمون أن كل مخالف ناصب وليس كذلك.

Prophet(PBUH) said (2 types of people in my ummah have no part in Islam, the Nasibis who wage war against ahlul bayt and those who do ghulu in religion.) 

(Shaikh Sadooq says) Also those who consider it halal to send la'an on Amirul momineen(as) and wage war against muslims and kill them, doing nikah with them is haram since they destroyed themselves with their own hands. The ignorant people think that every mukhalif(aami/sunni) is a nasibi even though that's not the case."
Posted by Bhooka_bhairiya at 08:47
Labels:

8 comments:

  1. bi_ithnillaah10 February 2011 at 16:29

    Great find mashaa Allaah, would you mind posting the direct citations though instead of just which book it is from? I would like to show friends this as well but I need to know which volume, hadeeth number, etc. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nader Zaveri10 February 2011 at 17:09

    This hadeeth is mursal, no chain of narrators.

    وَ قَالَ النَّبِيُّ ص صِنْفَانِ مِنْ أُمَّتِي لَا نَصِيبَ لَهُمَا فِي الْإِسْلَامِ النَّاصِبُ لِأَهْلِ بَيْتِي حَرْباً وَ غَالٍ فِي الدِّينِ مَارِقٌ مِنْهُ
    Source:
    - Al-Sadooq, Man Laa YaHDuruh Al-Faqeeh, vol. 3, pg. 408, hadeeth # 4425


    Brother, the last part is NOT considered part of the hadeeth, but it is Al-Sadooq's commentary. If you notice the parenthesis around the actual hadeeth, which is:

    4425 - وقال النبي صلى الله عليه وآله: (صنفان من أمتي لا نصيب لهما في الاسلام الناصب لاهل بيتي حربا، وغال في الدين مارق منه).
    Source: http://al-shia.org/html/ara/books/?mod=hadith&start=100&end=200

    So the last is actually Al-Sadooq's commentary. It is classical scholars opinion, so it holds a lot of weight.

    So this is Al-Sadooq's commentary:
    وَ مَنِ اسْتَحَلَّ لَعْنَ أَمِيرِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ ع وَ الْخُرُوجَ عَلَى الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَ قَتْلَهُمْ حُرِّمَتْ مُنَاكَحَتُهُ لِأَنَّ فِيهَا الْإِلْقَاءَ بِالْأَيْدِي إِلَى التَّهْلُكَةِ وَ الْجُهَّالُ يَتَوَهَّمُونَ أَنَّ كُلَّ مُخَالِفٍ نَاصِبٌ وَ لَيْسَ كَذَلِكَ
    "And whoever deems lawful the la`nah of Ameer Al-Mu'mineen, peace be upon him, and wages war upon the Muslims and kills them, doing nikaaH with them is haraam since they destroyed themselves with their own hands. The jaahil (ignorant) imagine (think) that every mukhaalif (opposer, i.e. sunnis) is a naasibee, and it is not that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bhooka_bhairiya10 February 2011 at 18:05

    @bi_ithnillaah: Thanks for appreciation sister. Bro Nader has already given the ref, the link is here(for al faqih I always take it from al-shia.org):
    http://www.al-shia.org/html/ara/books/lib-hadis/faqih-3/a137.htm

    @Nader Zaveri: Bro, thanks for visiting the blog! Bro, I did have some doubt about last part but the thing is that when Shaikh Sadooq's comment is listed, usually it's explicitly stated. For example, in the hadith right before this (i.e. hadith# 4424) you have pretty much the same thing but explicitly stated that it's from Shaikh Sadooq:
    قال مصنف هذا الكتاب رحمه الله: من نصب حربا لآل محمد صلوات الله عليهم فلا نصيب له في الاسلام فلهذا حرم نكاحهم

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nader Zaveri10 February 2011 at 22:09

    Yes, that is true. Majority of the time it says "The compiler of this book says:...". But if you go through Al-Faqeeh, he doesn't always put that when he does a commentary or expounds on a hadeeth.

    And I just checked my personal copy of Al-faqeeh, and it doesn't mention thats part of the hadeeth.

    So the best thing to do is to make sure you say that the last part is actually Sadooq's words and not the words of our Imaams (AS).

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bhooka_bhairiya10 February 2011 at 23:11

    @Nader: OK, I've edited my post and in the translation I've put the parentheses as they're in the arabic text. Should've done that initially, would be careful next time.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous11 February 2011 at 12:42

    obvious fabrication, you should be ashamed. but thank you for showing true face of tashayyu

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nader Zaveri11 February 2011 at 22:21

    Thank you Bhooka:

    Could you put in the blog post before that last part: "Al-Sadooq's said:"

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bhooka_bhairiya12 February 2011 at 00:08

    @Nader: Well bro, since that's not included in the arabic text I referred to from here:
    http://www.al-shia.org/html/ara/books/lib-hadis/faqih-3/a137.htm

    That's why I'll put that in parentheses.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)